The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1)

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1) file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1) book. Happy reading The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1) Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1) at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Tudor Falcon (The Tudor Series Book 1) Pocket Guide.

Yet, perhaps surprisingly, it is not only in BBC historical dramas that the Tudors have been presented in such a conservative style.

What is Kobo Super Points?

They have also appeared via many of the same conventions on the big screen. Yet even when not drawing on television directly for inspiration, the presentation of the Tudors in the cinema has often evoked the theatrical. Yet, as well as referencing television and the theatre, reference, and to a certain extent deference, to the past itself has also contributed immensely to the conventional style in which the Tudor period has customarily been conveyed in the cinema. In addition to generic conventions established by previous renditions, it has been governed by the use of historical locations when recreating the period.

The Dark Castle Lords Tudor Falcon book trailer

In spite of the colourful costumes and glamorous stars decorating these films, an unappealing sense of the past pervades. In stark contrast to the real castles and cathedrals that situated its predecessors within authentic stone and mortar, The Tudors paradoxically depicts its historical world through computer generation. Bloody, yet far from gloomy, this pixellated past is vibrantly new. It provides the perfect inauthentic backdrop for each inauthentic account. The Tudors , for example, clearly relies on effects rather than location-shooting at historical sites and in the very first episode treats viewers to CGI renderings of Whitehall Palace and Hampton Court as well as panoramic shots of London and Paris.

These non-existent settings offer precisely what cannot be offered by the concretised actuality of locations such as Haddon Hall and Durham Cathedral. No longer dominated by what survives of the past, shows like The Tudors are now untethered from the stylistic and production requirements of previous film and television historical drama.

However, abandoning authenticity has come at some cost to the reputation of contemporary international historical dramas. By jettisoning long-established principles for representing the past, series like The Tudors have also rejected the belief that historical drama should perform a pedagogical function.

The Private Lives of the Tudors

Costume film uses the mythic and symbolic aspects of the past as a means of providing pleasure, rather than instruction. By making no such claims to instruction, The Tudors was immediately attacked for its unapologetic use of history for drama instead of presenting drama as history. Rather than merely picking holes in it, many critics shredded the entire series as historical drama with no historical value. Many of its stars have become international celebrities. It has its own rather sophisticated website and has spawned fan sites, fan clubs, and fan fiction, as well as keeping Tudor blogs abuzz with commentary.

Hirst has played a large part in the current direction the internationally co-produced historical drama has taken because he has been centrally involved in several of them. I was literally the only person who knew what was going to happen.

Post navigation

In achieving resonance and relevance, The Tudors provoked numerous critics to complain of what they saw as deplorable historical inaccuracies. Put more simply, what is presented as fact is, in fact, fiction. Yet does this necessarily indict him as a sloppy researcher who deems history a mere inconvenience?


  1. PVT and Phase Behaviour Of Petroleum Reservoir Fluids (Developments in Petroleum Science).
  2. Sex, Politics, Power, and Artistic License in the Showtime Television Series.
  3. Who Will Take Care of Mom? A Guide for Family-Managed Senior Care.
  4. Movie Night.

You have to know a lot of Elizabethan history to make these mistakes; you have to know what really happened or probably happened before you can turn it into this particular story. Real characters are adjusted, real events are amended and relocated, plausible incidents are invented — all to serve the drama. Who do we dress? The result is therefore both dramatic and dramatically unhistorical. For instance, in relation to Elizabeth bedding Dudley in Elizabeth , he argues that while there is no evidence that they did, there is also no evidence that they did not.

For example, in the drama Cardinal Wolsey takes his own life, contrary to the historical account that he died of an illness.

Viewers, therefore, are offered a privileged view of a hidden moment of history that historians themselves have not had. Wolsey certainly had motive. I wanted him to go out with a bang. Thomas More must be executed, for example, and Anne Boleyn cannot be pardoned at the last minute and go on to live a happy life if any dramatisation is going to be seen as authentic.

History, Fiction, and The Tudors | SpringerLink

Even the scantiest general knowledge can be problematic for historical drama, because unlike fiction it has to contend with the fact that its audience may at the very least know the ending. Many would be aware, for example, that the rebel army would be defeated in the Spartacus series and that Cleopatra would take her own life in Rome. So too in The Tudors would the audience apprehend that ultimately Henry would die and make way for his children, with Elizabeth eventually ascending to the throne. For example, perhaps the greatest surprise of both Elizabeth and The Tudors had been that the monarchs looked nothing like we had expected, with a young and beautiful Elizabeth and a thin and beardless Henry.

Henry, in the final episode of The Tudors when he poses for his portrait, assumes, like Elizabeth, the iconic bearing that will carry his image to his people and his memory throughout the ages. The ending shows that the historical alterations that have been so criticised are not unsuitable after all, because they simply counter an already fabricated historical record.

We therefore witness the erasure from history of the story we have just watched and the authorised history created to replace it. As Thomas S. I think that all the portraits, all the images of rulers are usually lies. The way they present themselves to their public is a calculated way. So the images of kings that we see are often certainly tampered with. And that was his story. The story Hirst did, while imaginative and purposeful, was not necessarily novel or original.

Should on-screen depictions adhere to custom-designed legacies just because they are powerful in the public consciousness? The multinational financing, companies, casts, crews and locations combined with modern CGI engender historical creations that are designed to appeal to mass modern international audiences for whom particular national histories are far from sacrosanct. Yet one might question why such excess should be so objectionable when telling the story of Henry VIII.

The Tudors behind closed doors

The accepted image of the King, indeed perhaps the reason for his long-lived fame, is that he was a man given to massive excesses. He worked his way through a veritable army of wives and mistresses and, as portrayed by Holbein, also ate enough to feed one. In The Private Life of Henry VIII the royal palace is depicted as a happy place where, when Henry tells a joke, the camera follows the infectious laughter rolling through the corridors, past soldiers and guests, and into the kitchen where the cooks join in the merriment.

It depicts his affection for friends and lovers and also his brutality towards them and the consequent fear in which he is held. It portrays his love for his wives accompanied by his monstrous desire to kill them and above all focuses upon his self-centredness and egotism as a man who indulges in every advantage kingship can offer.

It also rescues the King from the conservatism of prior depictions. It is, after all, a counter-cultural depiction that The Tudors offers and one that in many respects does this particular monarch a favour. Cartmell, Deborah and I. Tauris , Freeman, Thomas S. Batsford , Parrill, Sue and William B. Robinson, William B. Far from being cinematically backward, s British film had dashes of imagination that outdid more famous or prestigious examples from the cinematic canon.

In his contribution to this book, Dave Rolinson, particularly in his recovery of the neglected The Horse's Mouth , aptly draws attention to a sharper edge to s British film comedy than is always acknowledged. British film of this period is not often credited with that kind of audacity or comic cheek. In fact, he was a chip off the old block. Living in a succession of luxurious nurseries, as prince he was regularly spoilt with gifts and allowed to indulge in a diet of rich foods. It was only when Edward contracted measles as a teenager, that his constitution was dangerously weakened.

Reginald Pole, later archbishop of Canterbury, claimed that in a fit of rage, the young prince once tore a living falcon into four pieces in front of his tutors. When he became king, Edward started to keep a diary — the only Tudor monarch to do so. A rather staid account of the key events of his reign, it also portrays the young king as cold, unfeeling and uncompromising — a dangerous blend of traits that might have hardened into tyranny if he had lived to maturity.

On the issue of religion, though, Edward had all the passion of a zealot.

Edward spent several hours a day in private devotion and, determined that his subjects should conform to his faith, he spent much of his short reign implementing a series of radical reforms. These also affected those closest to the young king. Mary has gone down in history as a severe, humourless monarch. The queen was extremely fond of her and gave her many valuable clothes, as well as an unusual number of shoes.

Although she and Jane sometimes performed together, Lucretia was a trained entertainer with impressive and presumably acrobatic skills. Mary was also an avid gambler and loved to play cards and board games. Like her father, she was fond of masques and plays, and cherished an abiding love of music. She also loved to provide entertainments and feasts for her court. She fell head over heels in love with him after seeing only his portrait, and lavished affection on him after they were married.

She loved to flirt with the many ambitious young men who frequented her court. Her liaison with Robert Dudley is well documented, as is her infatuation in old age with his stepson, the Earl of Essex, and her more sober relationships with trusted advisers such as Lord Burghley and Sir Francis Walsingham. In her own private world, it was the women who held sway. These women would help the queen relax by playing cards with her, embroidering, practising dance steps and gossiping about the affairs of the court.

They would see her divested of her courtly splendour and knew the secrets of her carefully crafted image as the Virgin Queen. Home Period Tudor The Tudors behind closed doors. June 10, at pm.

New on Amazon

William Dalrymple on the East India Company. Was William the Conqueror a war criminal? The brutal story of the Harrying of the North. Gangs and knife-crime fears: how has Britain responded through history? Try our range of BBC bestselling history magazines today! Subscribe Now.